---
id: "2098638004541677866"
created_at: "2026-09-12T05:01:05+00:00"
lang: und
in_reply_to: "2098172520180400327"
in_reply_to_user: "1243904411425964040"
thread_root: "2098638004541677866"
kind: reply_to_other
quotes:
  - "2098345864943005934"
urls:
  - expanded: "https://x.com/IntuitMachine/status/2098345864943005934"
---

@mike_mates ???

https://t.co/XlOT8OUSYI

---

### Padre `2098172520180400327` Mike @mike_mates 2026-09-10

¿Hay alguna simulación de estas que sea correcta? 🤔

#### Citaba a `2097751686567649489` Joonas Nättilä @joonas_nattila 2026-09-09

Visualization of the Navier-Stokes blowup solution: left- and right-handed swirls (blue and purple) wind up while the axial flow (brown) shrinks, but slower.  As a result, the vortex core develops a singularity. https://t.co/D3JpdqAOiL

### Cita `2098345864943005934` Carlos E. Perez @IntuitMachine 2026-09-11

2-body problem is integrable. 3-body becomes chaotic.

2D Navier–Stokes stays smooth. OpenAI discovers that 3D NS leads to singularities.

Same lesson: one extra degree of freedom can unlock an entirely new mechanism.

“More degrees of freedom” becomes “different mathematics.” https://t.co/OAMxKJku4U